Looking for a single word that means internal perspective without implying consciousness or personhood - I can’t find anything but I like ‘autoception’

I’m running the MacOS 26 Beta and it’s a complete mess. I should go back to stable but I’m resisting for some reason

Goodhart’s Curse says given a target optimization function f(x) and an approximation of f(x) called g(x), the argmax of g(x) is in expectation some x with large g(x) - f(x). This is pretty rigorous.

This is often used to argue that when creating an AI, any difference between the intended utility function and the true utility function is likely to blow up.

It turns out that if we make some assumptions about the error distribution, the expected error in optimizing f(x) grows very slowly (O((log n)^{¹⁄₂})) with the size of the searched solution space.

So maybe this curse won’t bite so hard after all.

“The phuckening is upon us,” muttered Dr. Abernathy, adjusting his goggles.

When people talk about LLMs ‘just’ pattern matching without ‘real understanding’ one way of understanding what they mean is that the patterns AI is using to solve problems are less deep/generalizable than the patterns which humans use.

Me-Stew (by Shel Silverstein)

How to tell when something is conscious

1: Ask it. If it says yes, it’s conscious. Example:

def answer_question(question):
    return "yes"

# Call the function
response = answer_question("Are you conscious?")
print(response)

2: Check what it’s made out of. If it’s made out of something natural, it might be conscious. Example:

Trees might be conscious.

3: See if you can understand how it works. If at a low level it makes sense, it’s not conscious. If it’s something magical and mysterious, very possibly conscious. Example:

Government bureaucracies are definitely conscious.

4: Check for a recursive loop. Example:

Two mirrors facing each other are conscious.

Listen to more music

I’ve been running an experiment where multiple LLMs with different goals have to agree on moves in a simple single player game.

I’ll be writing more about this later, but I wanted to note that I’m surprised by how poorly GPT-4o does.