I believe in free speech and respectful debate
People have the right to be wrong. No matter how strongly you hold a belief, respect the humanity of those who disagree with you.
I believe in free speech and respectful debate
People have the right to be wrong. No matter how strongly you hold a belief, respect the humanity of those who disagree with you.
An AI investment bubble could burst soon, but that wouldn’t really change my view on the core questions: How hard is it to build AGI? How close are we to AI that transforms the economy and creates serious risks?
I actually hope the bubble does burst, because it would likely slow down the competitive race between AI companies and give us more time to prepare. But whether the bubble bursts or not will probably come down to (in the grand scheme of things) fairly small differences in AI capabilities over the next couple of years.
I was a little shocked to learn about the undecidable Post Correspondence Problem. But when phrased about the unrecognizability of the complement, it is a lot less shocking.
There is generally always a mismatch between our intuitive sense of what an idea means and any abstract formal way to define an intuitive concept.
I would like to clearly explain the reason for this mismatch and find a way forward by working to create a framework where intuitive human-native concepts can be discussed with appropriate degrees of precision.
There are two or three kinds of (related but distinct) intelligence: speed, and correctness.
Correctness might be divided into accuracy (how good ones predictions are) and precision (how many things one is able to predict).
It is possible to have a very fast intelligence which cannot understand many things but is very correct about the things it does understand; it is possible to have a very slow intelligence which understands most things well enough to make decent predictions but has lots of error, or any other combination of traits.
In practice, if you are slow and correct, you are often thought to be dumb, and if you are wrong and fast you are also thought to be dumb. These are different failure modes, however.
In the 2000s, I was born, moved to the east coast, learned to talk then walk then run then read.
In the 2010s, I learned to ride a bike, I got a sister, I did eight years of grade school and half of high school, lived on a farm with goats, and came to love math.
In the 2020s (so far), I lived through a pandemic, met my future wife, lived outdoors traveling for five months including paddling from Canada to NYC, did undergraduate school, married my wife, had my first child, and started working on AI safety.
If all goes well I still get at least five more decades!
2030s
2040s
2050s
2060s
2070s
Things will stay interesting…
Most important book in my education might have been this one. Read it in 9th grade, was ready to teach myself calculus in 10th grade.
I’m like Cinderella
My wife is like the evil stepmother
And my son is like the stepsisters who get all the special treatment